Three panels of experts put down critics' allegations that missile defense programs don't work or have other shortcomings, allegations that are being used by some leaders in Washington to underpin spending cuts in those missile protection programs. That marathon round of presentations came in a forum organized by the Marshall Institute think tank, and by the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance (MDAA), an industry-related group. The Marshall Institute breakfast event at the Capitol Hill Club focused on missile defense systems that…
Recommended
SpaceX’s IPO Filing Gives First Look Into Company’s Financials
DoD Awards DPA Funds To Solid Rocket Motor Component Supplier PacSci
Trending
Congress Updates
Warren And Sheehy Renew Call for “Right to Repair” In NDAA
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sen. Timothy Sheehy (R-Mont.), two members of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), are renewing their call for “Right to Repair” language in the National […]
HASC Looks To Restrict USV Deliveries Without Navy CONOPS And Strategy
The House Armed Services Committee’s (HASC) fiscal year 2027 defense policy draft bill aims to restrict the Navy’s use of unmanned surface vessels (USV) until it decides on key factors […]
Gaps In Army’s Tactical Counter-Drone Capabilities Remain Concern Of HASC
A draft defense policy bill released this week says the Army is fielding counter-drone capabilities for defense of fixed sites and maneuver forces but suggests that troops at the lowest […]
HASC Wants Closer Look At Army’s SBMC Program, Cites Avoiding Past IVAS Missteps
The House Armed Services Committee (HASC) wants a closer look at the Army’s Soldier Borne Mission Command (SBMC) effort, citing support for the development program while expressing caution to avoid […]