The House has defeated by voice vote a proposal to block funding for a new space-based missile defense system.The proposed amendment to the fiscal year 2018 defense appropriations bill would have denied money needed to carry out a provision in the House-passed FY 2018 defense authorization bill that would direct the Missile Defense Agency to begin developing a space-based system for intercepting ballistic missiles. Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.), who offered the amendment July 27, argued that a space-based system could cost hundreds…
Senate defense authorizers are seeking more info from the Army on its plans for scaling and deploying small drone capabilities citing concern with the service’s current “fragmented and insufficient” approach. […]
The Senate Armed Services Committee’s (SASC) fiscal year 2027 defense policy bill adds new provisions that would raise the Navy and Marine Corps’ minimum requirement for amphibious warships and extend […]
The Army is planning to initiate its competition to build the Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV)-Heavy in the fourth quarter of this year, a senior acquisition official has said. Jesse Tolleson, […]
The Senate Armed Services Committee’s (SASC) version of the FY 2027 defense policy bill looks to cut the ability for the Trump administration to buy foreign-made warships, but still allow […]
The House has defeated by voice vote a proposal to block funding for a new space-based missile defense system.
The proposed amendment to the fiscal year 2018 defense appropriations bill would have denied money needed to carry out a provision in the House-passed FY 2018 defense authorization bill that would direct the Missile Defense Agency to begin developing a space-based system for intercepting ballistic missiles.
Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.), who offered the amendment July 27, argued that a space-based system could cost hundreds of billions of dollars and still might not work.
The idea of a space-based system “has gone in and out of fashion for the last 30 years,” Foster said. “But every time this space-based concept has been looked at by technologically competent outside experts, it was deemed to be unworkable, impossibly expensive, vulnerable to countermeasures, easy for an opponent to destroy, easy to overwhelm with a small number of enemy missiles, or all of the above.”
But Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) countered that a space-based system represents the next logical step in U.S. missile defense development and would allow the United States to intercept hostile missiles early in their flight. He said opponents have overstated the expense of such a system and that a “regionally deployed system” would cost a relatively modest $20 billion over 30 years.
“We can build this system,” Franks insisted. “We will build it.”
Meanwhile, Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) sought to offer an amendment that would deny funding needed to implement an authorization-bill provision that would set up a space corps in the Air Force Department (Defense Daily, July 25). But his amendment was not among those that the House Rules Committee cleared for floor consideration.
The House went on to pass its overall defense appropriations bill late July 27 as part of a “minibus” that includes several other appropriations bills. The vote was 235 to 192.
The Army is “looking at options” for how it would support planned boosts to munitions production if Congress doesn’t pass a reconciliation bill with the requested funding, a senior acquisition […]