Search

Key Lawmaker Proposes Full Funding For Defense, Short-Term CR For Non-Defense

Key Lawmaker Proposes Full Funding For Defense, Short-Term CR For Non-Defense

With Congress still trying to reach a fiscal year 2018 budget agreement, Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, has proposed legislation (H.J.Res. 124) to fully fund defense for the rest of the fiscal year.The measure, introduced Dec. 13, would provide $664.1 billion for defense, or about $28.4 billion above the Trump administration’s request. The total includes the $658.2 billion that the House approved in July for base defense funding and overseas contingency operations (OCO), plus the…

Subscriber-only content. Please log in below.

Not a subscriber or registered user yet?

Please contact us at clientservices@accessintel.com or call us at 888-707-5814 (Monday – Thursday 9:00 a.m. – 5:30 p.m. and Friday 9:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. ET.), to start a free trial, get pricing information, order a reprint, or post an article link on your website.



Congress Updates

Key Defense Committee Members Face Tight Midterm Races, Including HASC GOP’ers In Virginia

As the mid-term elections near with polls showing an increasing likelihood of a switch in majority control in the House and potentially the Senate, three Virginia Republicans on the House […]


‘Theoretical Potential’ to Achieve 1,509 Combat-Coded Fighters by 2035, USAF Says

In the latest U.S. Air Force fighter force structure report submitted to Congress, the service speaks of a “theoretical potential” to achieve a goal of 1,509 combat-coded fighters in the […]


Hegseth Pushes For Reconciliation With At Least $350 Billion For Defense ‘Regardless’ Of Midterms Outcome

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday the Trump administration plans to continue its push for at least $350 billion in defense funds via the reconciliation process “regardless of what happens […]


Bipartisan Push in Senate to Hasten Export of 155 mm, GMLRS, HIMARS for Ukraine

A small, bipartisan group of senators is backing the Fast Tracking European Investment in Ukraine’s Defense Act, S. 5175, to hasten the export of allied buys of U.S. munitions for […]

Key Lawmaker Proposes Full Funding For Defense, Short-Term CR For Non-Defense

With Congress still trying to reach a fiscal year 2018 budget agreement, Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, has proposed legislation (H.J.Res. 124) to fully fund defense for the rest of the fiscal year.

The measure, introduced Dec. 13, would provide $664.1 billion for defense, or about $28.4 billion above the Trump administration’s request. The total includes the $658.2 billion that the House approved in July for base defense funding and overseas contingency operations (OCO), plus the $5.9 billion the Trump administration requested in a budget amendment in November to defend against North Korean ballistic missiles, repair damaged ships and increase troop levels in Afghanistan. CAPITOL

The legislation would block automatic defense spending cuts that are slated to take effect in January under the Budget Control Act of 2011.

“Funding national defense is a top priority, especially in these uncertain times of instability around the globe,” Frelinghuysen said in a statement. “Our troops and commanders must have the resources they need right now to advance peace and our nation’s interests abroad.”

His proposal also would keep the rest of the federal government running at FY 2017 funding levels under a continuing resolution (CR) that would last until Jan. 19. The CR that currently funds the government expires Dec. 22.

Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, welcomed the legislation, saying there is a “bipartisan consensus on the depth of our military’s readiness crisis and the resources required to begin to fix it.”

But the proposal’s fate in Congress is unclear, as Democrats have insisted that full defense funding not move forward without a similar arrangement for non-defense spending.

“Opponents of this bill argue that we should put our urgent national security needs on hold until we reach a similar consensus on a whole host of other domestic programs,” Thornberry said in a statement. “That is the approach we have taken for the past six years and the results are indisputable: the number of our troops killed in training accidents is increasing, our military capabilities are eroding, our enemies have become emboldened, and America is less secure. To continue to use defense funding as a political football in the face of these undisputed consequences is irresponsible.”