LaPlante To Industry: Assess What It Takes To Get After Five-Fold Production Rate Increases

As the Pentagon looks ahead to continuing production ramp-up efforts heading into the next administration, the department’s acquisition chief said Wednesday industry should assess what it would take to get after a five-fold increase of their current manufacturing rates.

“Every company should be saying what would it take for me to go five times my production rate,” Bill LaPlante, under secretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, said during a discussion at an Axios event.

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Bill LaPlante receives a tour of a Joint Light Tactical Vehicle at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont., Nov. 1, 2024. (U.S. Air Force photo illustration by Senior Airman Breanna Christopher Volkmar)

LaPlante has spearheaded a range of initiative to boost production efforts, including releasing the Pentagon’s first National Defense Industrial Strategy (NDIS) and promoting co-manufacturing opportunities with international partners, while he reiterated on Wednesday that challenges with production both in the U.S. and abroad are “fundamentally a resourcing issue right now.”

“We found that if you have the resources, sometimes you might not like the timelines initially, you can get the production ramped up. And we’re doing [that] across many systems. It’s really [about] getting the resources and sticking with it. Industry is not going to do it on its own and nor would I if I were them,” LaPlante said.

During a House Armed Services Committee hearing earlier this year, LaPlante made his pitch to lawmakers to support higher production rates for weapons programs, citing it as key to bringing down unit costs and ensuring the department can move more innovative technologies from research and development into manufacturing (Defense Daily, Feb. 15). 

“You cannot skimp on production. And production has been the bill payer since the end of the Cold War. It still is a bill payer. We still have situations where, at the end of the budget, to balance the budget, people lower production numbers because that’s where the money is. We have to stop that. We have to actually increase the production rates,” LaPlante said on Wednesday.

The Pentagon last month released the implementation plan for its NDIS, which noted plans to invest over $77 billion over the next two fiscal years on programs and initiatives such as investments to ramp up munitions production, support to the submarine industrial base, addressing supply chain vulnerabilities and pursuing international co-production efforts (Defense Daily, Oct. 29).

LaPlante on Wednesday also provided an update on the Army’s push to increase its rate of 155mm artillery shell production up to 100,000 rounds per month by late 2025, confirming the service has now reached a manufacturing rate of 50,000 such shells per month.

“I pulled the number of 100,000 [155mm rounds per month] out of the air, called the CEO of General Dynamics [GD] and said, ‘Stay in your chair. Without breaking the law, how can you get to 100,000 a month?’ And she was shocked. And of course the Army was shocked. Everybody was shocked. But once they started working on it and we started getting the money to them, they’re going to get there,” LaPlante said.

Doug Bush, the Army’s top acquisition official, said in May that the national security supplemental passed this spring included around $6 billion to boost 155mm artillery ammunition production, double what the Army had requested, noting the additional funding will allow production lines to sustain a rate of 100,000 artillery shells per month for longer (Defense Daily, May 2).

The Army’s goal to build 100,000 155mm rounds per month by late 2025 would represent a nearly fourfold increase from its capacity in recent years, as the service works to replenish its own stockpiles and continue supporting requirements for international partners such as Ukraine.

The service has also been building three new production lines for 155mm artillery ammunition in Texas, funded in a previous supplemental, to include a new facility from General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems and Turkish industry subcontractors, to include Turkish industry partners that’s handling construction, installation and follow-on production of the new 155mm projectile metal parts lines (Defense Daily, Feb. 22).

Launch Industry May Benefit from FAA Review of Commercial Rules

Billionaire SpaceX magnate Elon Musk is on tap to head a Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in the new administration–a position which would put him squarely in the cross hairs of conflict of interest prohibitions, if any recommendations to cut Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DoD, and other federal regulations end up benefiting his businesses.

Just as this DOGE news spurts from the “flood the zone” mentality of the incoming White House, the FAA on Thursday said that it is undertaking a review of 2020’s Part 450 commercial space launch and reentry licensing rules.

“The FAA is seeking to update the [Part 450] licensing rule to foster more clarity, flexibility, efficiency, and innovation,” FAA Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Kelvin Coleman said in a statement. “Making timely licensing determinations without compromising public safety is a top priority.”

Musk has criticized the FAA for its strict licensing rules that he said hampers launch. The FAA fined him $175,000 in February last year for not submitting a mandatory collision avoidance analysis to the FAA before the August 2022 launch of Starlink satellites–a sum paid by SpaceX last October–and more than $633,000 in September for licensing violations in two Falcon 9 launches last year.

Commercial launch rules are under the FAA’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation established in 1984 when then President Reagan signed the Commercial Space Launch Act.

Chapter 135 of Title 10 covers regulations for DoD and intelligence community launches.

Freeing commercial launches from onerous regulations may benefit national security space and further reduce launch costs. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 is now the only allowed provider for U.S. Space Force’s National Security Space Launch (NSSL), as United Launch Alliance‘s (ULA) Vulcan rocket seeks final certification for its first NSSL mission–USSF-106.

ULA is a partnership between Boeing [BA] and Lockheed Martin [LMT].

The FAA “ended Fiscal Year 2024 with a record 148 licensed commercial space operations, up more than 30 percent over the prior year,” the agency said on Thursday. “The FAA forecasts that number may more than double by FY 2028.”

SpaceX has billions of dollars in U.S. government launch, NASA crew transport, Starlink internet, and Starshield contracts.

The Pentagon has helped fund Starlink for Ukraine, and SpaceX is to provide communications for the military under the Space Force’s Proliferated Low-Earth Orbit contract.

 

DIU Component Selects 10 Companies To Protect Navy’s Operational Technology

The National Security Innovation Network (NSIN) on Thursday selected 10 small companies to scale their technologies to help the Navy protect industrial control systems aboard its platforms and facilities.

NSIN, a component of the Defense Innovation Unit (DIU), said the startups selected under the Propel Maritime Digital Defense accelerator will allow the Navy to develop cyber solutions for its critical infrastructure. NSIN worked with the U.S. Naval Information Forces on the selections.

The selectees and their technologies are Fathom5, whose software enables security by design, Forward Edge-AI, a provider of custom artificial intelligence-built software, Galvanick, a developer of cybersecurity solutions, NUTS Technologies, a provider of security solutions for cloud environments, Project Castle by HIGHWAY Ventures, which is focused on security and reliability of operational technology networks, Ryme, LLC, whose technology detects cyber tampering, Symbiosis.io LLC, a provider of an AI platform that identifies and stops cyber threats, TeamWorx Security, which conducts malware analysis and cyber incident response, ThermoAI provides alerts for cyber threats, and Xona Systems, which offers a secure user platform for zero-trust remote access for operational technology.

Hypersonic Weapons On Zumwalt Destroyer Pushed Back To 2027

Testing the first hypersonic missiles on the USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) destroyer is running at least two years behind plan for 2025, pushed back to 2027, a Navy official said Thursday.

“So Zumwalt, we’re trying to figure out as that platform comes out of her build yard maintenance period and we start to look at what is all the final testing we’re going to have to do on our side, with our system, the testing is continuing, but… ‘25 is not a date that’s going to happen. So we’re just still trying to figure out where all that is going to match up, and when are we going to get that out there. But all the testing is continuing to move forward, and it’s going pretty well right now,” Vice Adm. Johnny Wolfe, Director of Strategic Systems Programs (SSP), told reporters during the Naval Submarine League’s annual symposium in Arlington, Va.

USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) preparing to dock at HII’s Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, Miss. on Aug. 19, 2023 for a maintenance period that is replacing its unused Advanced Gun System with large diameter missile tubes to field the Conventional Prompt Strike hypersonic weapon. (Photo: HII)
USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) preparing to dock at HII’s Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, Miss., on Aug. 19, 2023 for a maintenance period that is replacing its unused Advanced Gun System with large diameter missile tubes to field the Conventional Prompt Strike hypersonic weapon. (Photo: HII)

SSP is the Navy program manager for Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS), the Navy version of the shared hypersonic weapon with the Army. The two services are working together to design and develop the common All-Up Round of a Common Hypersonic Glide Body, missile body and rocket booster to be launched from different platforms.

Wolfe confirmed testing of CPS weapons on DDG-1000 is now expected to start further out in 2027-2028, primarily due to weapon testing running behind schedule.

In June, the Army and Navy said they completed a milestone flight test of the hypersonic weapon after several tests were canceled in 2023 (Defense Daily, July 2).

The Army was originally due to first field the hypersonic weapon by the end of 2023, but the test delays pushed that back to next year. A June Government Accountability Office report projected the Army will not field its hypersonic weapon battery until fiscal year 2025 in more recent test and production plans (Defense Daily, June 18).

The Navy previously planned to start testing CPS on Zumwalt-class destroyers by fiscal year 2025, replacing the unused Advanced Gun System with four CPS-capable 87-inch large diameter missile tubes that can carry three missiles each, for 12 total per ship. The service plans to ultimately deploy CPS on all three Zumwalt-class ships before adding them to the new Virginia-class attack submarines with the Virginia Payload Module (VPM). Deploying CPS to VPM was also previously planned to be ready by fiscal year 2029 (Defense Daily, Feb. 3, 2023).

Wolfe said his program is proceeding well to focus on making CPS ready to test on the Zumwalt despite the overall missile testing delays and additional delays in the destroyer’s maintenance period upgrading the ship.

“So the testing that we need to do to get to the final integration of Zumwalt – that’s irrespective of where the Zumwalt is at, whether it’s in the water because the way we’ve modularized this, the work that’s being done on Zumwalt is to get the tubes, the big, large diameter tubes in the platform – because of the way we’ve designed Conventional Prompt Strike to be modular.”

During the 2022 symposium, Wolfe said the biggest challenge in deploying hypersonic weapons on naval vessels was getting the weapon through its current all-up round integration by 2025 (Defense Daily, Nov. 8, 2022)

The Navy awarded HII a $155 million modification last year for the current DDG-1000 modernization period to install the CPS-capable missile tubes, following previous contracts that planned the modernization and procured long-lead time materials. The award expected an 18-month drydock availability to change the weapon system as well as perform other maintenance and modernization work, with work planned to be finished by September 2025. (Defense Daily, Aug. 30, 2023). 

The USS Zumwalt first arrived at Ingalls Shipbuilding in August 2023. Wolfe now confirmed DDG-1000 is not due to leave HII’s [HII] Ingalls Shipbuilding facility in Pascagoula, Miss., for about another year.

Under the previous schedule before the missile testing delays, the Navy had scheduled the first two to three CPS test shots off DDG-1000 by December 2025.

Hypersonic missile test at at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii in 2024. (Photo: U.S. Department of Defense)
Hypersonic missile test at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii in 2024. (Photo: U.S. Department of Defense)

Despite these delays, Wolfe said his program is currently testing and building the payload module adapter that goes into the missile tubes, so that will be ready once the shipyard work is finished. He also noted the Navy has built a facility to test the eject system since the missile has to be ejected from the tubes before launch.

“So all of that is continuing on. What we’re talking about is the final integration of when the weapon system, you know, proofing and developments, all done to the time I get it on the Zumwalt and I get the Zumwalt through her final testing, which is the graduation exercise where we actually launch a weapon out of Zumwalt,” he said.

While Wolfe is not responsible for the DDG-1000 and its maintenance period, he reported the conversion and maintenance work has gone very well despite overall delays. He argued the main limitation on CPS progress has been budget limits and progress on testing the hypersonic glide body with the Army, not delays in getting the ship out of drydock.

“It’s not going to be the limiter of the platform at this point. [The limiter] really is finishing all the testing, and a lot of that is in relation to how we’ve done testing with the Army as well. To get their testing completed, followed on by our testing. And so it’s just a matter of the way we were resourced. We were very limited on the assets that we had to be able to test,” he said.

Wolfe said this means whenever there is a hiccup in the hypersonic weapon testing regime, it stops everything in the testing line because they do not have enough assets allocated to the effort to proceed to the next test.

“You got to recycle and do all those things. So it’s that build up, which is what we’re experiencing right now.”

He insisted these delays should not impact installing the hypersonic weapons on VPM-equipped Virginia-class submarines.

That timeline will largely be up to when the submarines are deployed, if pushed back past the originally scheduled FY 2029 for CPS emplacement.

“The question is going to be, when will the first Virginia-class with the Virginia Payload Module be ready to go,” then they can start putting the capacity in it.

Navy Plans Virginia Subs Go To Block Eight Before SSN(X) Starts

The Navy director for Naval Reactors said the service plans to at least reach Block Eight on Virginia-class attack submarines before moving on to next-generation submarines now planned for the 2040s.

“I think if you look at us as a Navy, we have said that we’re going to continue to build the [

Virginia-class], that is currently the plan. We’re looking to go to a Block Eight. We are proceeding on with SSN(X) after that,” Adm. Bill Houston, director for Naval Reactors, said Wednesday during the Naval Submarine League’s annual symposium in Arlington, Va.

A mockup of the Block V Virginia-class attack submarine with the Virginia Payload Module in use. (Image: General Dynamics Electric Boat)
A mockup of the Block V Virginia-class attack submarine with the Virginia Payload Module in use. (Image: General Dynamics Electric Boat)

While Navy officials here confirmed the Virginia-class Block Eight was first referenced in the Navy’s 30-year long-range shipbuilding plan from the FY ‘25 budget request released in March, it was not named in the unclassified public version of the document.

The shipbuilding plan said trade studies and technology development efforts have started for SSN(X), with planned lead boat construction set for the early 2040s. 

Navy previously planned for SSN(X) to start construction in FY ‘31, then in the mid-2030s, and now development delays have pushed it back into the early 2040s in the FY ‘25 budget request.

SSN(X) is one of several next-generation development projects that has been delayed due to budget issues related to the budget caps caused by the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023. Other future projects pushed back include the next-generation destroyer DDG(X) and the manned fighter to be part of Next Generation Air Dominance, F/A-XX.

The FY ‘25 shipbuilding plan said the construction delay for SSN(X) from mid-2030s to the early 2040s “presents a significant challenge to the submarine design industrial base associated with the extended gap between the Columbia-class and SSN(X) design programs, which the Navy will manage.”

Houston obliquely referenced that issue of overlap in the design between the Columbia-class SSBN and SSN(X) by noting the Navy could build more than the currently planned 12 SSBNs.

“We’re also looking at maintaining that large hull platform of the Columbia-class. And, to be clear, the Nuclear Posture Review, our building plan says at least 12 Columbias. And I think if you look at the threats around the world, there may be a need for more Columbias. But there is nothing officially put out to go do that, but all options open,” Houston said.

He added that the Navy does not want to recreate the gap between ship designs that increases costs delays, but maintain the long-term industrial base and design expertise for these boats.

The Congressional Budget Office’s annual 2022 analysis of the Navy shipbuilding plans said under that version of long-term shipbuilding plans, with SSN(X) production starting in the mid-2030s, estimated the boats would cost about $6.2 to 7.2 billion each. That cost was related to an estimated displacement weight 11 percent larger than the Seawolf-class submarine while using features from the Seawolf-, Los Angeles-, and Virginia-class submarines. The Navy estimated SSN(X) would cost $5.6 billion each (Defense Daily, Nov. 15, 2022).

USAF Options for Manned NGAD Include Quick Refueling, Shorter Landing Zones at Protected Bases

As the U.S. Air Force reviews requirements and the continuance of the manned Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) sixth generation fighter, options on the table may include quick refueling and shorter landing zones at protected bases.

“I don’t know about the size or scalability of it [manned NGAD] because I still need range which requires wing space and other space for refueling and all that stuff, but if I refuel on the ground and I have base defense and I can refuel quickly and land in a shorter distance, I’ve now got optionality,” Lt. Gen. David Harris, the deputy chief of staff for Air Force Futures, said in a discussion with reporters on Wednesday after he addressed the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies’ inaugural Future of Airpower forum in Arlington, Va.

“I need to buy myself time and space to get this thing to land, refuel, rearm, refit and get it in the air again as fast as I possibly can,” he said. “We’re going through the analysis to kind of rethink [the requirements].”

Unimproved air strips or runways on smaller islands is another possibility to complicate China’s targeting problem, as the Air Force’s Pacific presence to counter China is centered on Guam’s Andersen AFB and Okinawa’s Kadena Air Base. The Air Force has undertaken an effort to refurbish the World War II-era North Field on the 39-square mile island of Tinian where B-29s took off to bomb Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The Air Force is deciding on whether manned NGAD will go forward, though the change in administration in January may herald changes, including the makeup and survival of the Air Force NGAD review panel headed by Tim Grayson, a special assistant to current Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall and a former head of DARPA’s strategic technology office and CIA intelligence officer (Defense Daily, Sept. 16).

Others on the NGAD panel include former Air Force Chief of Staffs David Goldfein, John Jumper and Norton Schwartz; former DoD acquisition chief Paul Kaminski; former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Joseph Ralston; and Natalie Crawford, a specialist in air and space policy at RAND.

Harris said that it’s possible that the Air Force will offload some requirements from manned NGAD to the unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) and that, while the artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled CCAs, hold significant promise, the Air Force still needs a manned fighter.

“I believe that we haven’t seen the last manned fighter yet, only because I’m not certain that the automation and the AI is where it truly needs to be,” he said. “We’re still building into that right now, but the reason why CCA Increment 1 is there is for ‘speed to ramp.’ What I need to do is get this thing on the ground, give it to the experimental ops unit and start flying these things together.”

Anduril Industries and General Atomics may conduct first flights in the next year of the Fury and Gambit winners in CCA Increment 1–first flights that could result soon thereafter in the beginning of developmental test under the Air Force CCA Experimental Operations Unit at Nellis AFB, Nev.’s 53rd Wing (Defense Daily, Sept. 17).

“I’d like for it [CCA] to connect in with more than just an NGAD,” Harris said on Wednesday. “I want it to connect to F-15EX. What if I connected it to a B-52?”

The NGAD program began a decade ago, and the requirements date from 2017. It is those requirements that the Air Force is re-examining, given DoD’s citation of China’s accelerated technological advancements.

Some defense technologists believe that manned NGAD will have to be smaller in design than now planned or offload requirements to the autonomous CCAs, especially if the Air Force retains Kendall’s per unit cost goal of around $80 million to $90 million–the F-35 unit cost–for manned NGAD (Defense Daily, Nov. 1). Such a unit cost would mean the service would have to shave about $150 million off the current estimated unit cost of manned NGAD.

Coast Guard Expects DHS Approval Shortly To Begin Icebreaker Construction But Needs More Funding

The Coast Guard expects the Department of Homeland Security next month to green light the start of production of the nation’s first new heavy polar icebreaker in nearly 50 years, although delivery of the initial polar security cutter (PSC) will occur in 2030, a year later than the most recent estimates and about six years later than original plans.

The Coast Guard will also need more funding to complete construction of the first PSC than has been appropriated so far, Vice Adm. Thomas Allan, the service’s deputy commandant for mission support, told a House panel on Thursday.

Negotiations with Bollinger Shipyards are expected to be completed in December, at which time the final price on the PSC should be known and how much more funding the Coast Guard will need from Congress, Allan told the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s panel that oversees the Coast Guard.

The Coast Guard in mid-December will ask DHS to approve the start of construction on the ship, Allan said.

During the final critical design review in September, design of the ship was more than 80 percent complete and that percentage is expected to be higher when a procurement readiness review is conducted this month, he said.

The estimate of that PSC production is about to commence is in line with Coast Guard assessments earlier this year (Defense Daily, May 7). Recently, the Coast Guard had said that it does not project delivery of the first vessel before fiscal year 2029, which begins in October 2028.

However, Allan told the panel that the Coast Guard will deliver the ship in 2030.

Heather MacLeod, director of homeland security and justice for the Government Accountability Office, told the panel that design stability is one of her office’s open recommendations on the PSC program, noting it is crucial before construction begins to avoid future cost increases.

Allan praised Bollinger Shipyards’ commitment to the PSC program. The Louisiana-based shipbuilder took over responsibility for the icebreaker when it acquired VT Halter Marine in late 2022. VT Halter Marine, which had been owned by Singapore’s ST Engineering, won the PSC contract in April 2029, garnering $745.9 million to design and build the first of up to three ships, a deal that contained options for two more icebreakers for a total value of $1.9 billion.

VT Halter Marine in late 2021 received $552.7 million for the second PSC. The Coast Guard did not request funding for the program in fiscal year 2025 as it seeks to catchup before awarding a third production contract. The House and Senate Appropriations panels that fund DHS have both agreed with the request.

In August, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the cost for three new PSCs is $5.1 billion, 60 percent above the Coast Guard’s estimate (Defense Daily, Aug. 21). CBO also projects the cost of the first ship to be $1.9 billion and the two other vessels $1.6 billion apiece on average.

The Coast Guard’s fleet mix analysis calls for eight to nine polar icebreakers, which would include a mix of heavy and medium vessels. The service currently operates one heave icebreaker, the Polar Star, commissioned in 1976, and one medium icebreaker, the Healy, commissioned in 1999. Both vessels are operating beyond their expected service life.

To help close the gap between when the first PSC is operational and the current needs being met by the 399-foot Polar Star and 420-foot Healy, the Coast Guard is acquiring the Aiviq ice class commercial ship from Offshore Service Vessels.

The 361-foot Aiviq is expected to be in the Coast Guard’s inventory by the end of 2024, Allan said. The ship is about 25 percent painted “Coast Guard icebreaker red” and is currently underway with Offshore Service Vessels and the American Bureau of Shipbuilding for an evaluation, he said, adding that in “the future weeks” the Coast Guard will be on the ship to understand how it can operate the platform in the Arctic.

The Coast Guard is seeking $25 million in FY ’25 to crew and provision the commercial icebreaker, which Allan expects to be operating the vessel in the Arctic in 2026, he said.

The PSC program has been beset with myriad challenges, stemming in part from the COVID-19 pandemic, but to a larger degree by the fact that the last domestically-built heavy icebreaker was commissioned in 1977 and the U.S. industrial base has little experience with these complex ships.

GAO’s MacLeod, in a gloomy forecast, said the Coast Guards current backlog of shore infrastructure projects is around $7 billion, made worse by limited facilities in the Arctic region to conduct missions there.

“Further, given competing demands of managing the growing backlog while replacing its aging assets, the Coast Guard will likely face challenges carrying out its Arctic missions, including assisting efforts to counter Russia and China’s activities in the region,” she said.

The Coast Guard operates its polar icebreakers in the Arctic and Antarctic, conducting scientific, resupply, presence, and other missions. Russia has a fleet of 55 icebreakers and China four, and the U.S. wants to maintain a persistent presence in the Arctic as sea routes and access to natural resources open as sea ice melts.

DoD’s Replicator 1.2 Includes Small UASs, Loitering Munition, Drone Development Effort

The Pentagon on Wednesday disclosed additional capabilities selected for its Replicator initiative to get after fielding innovative technology rapidly at scale, which includes small drones from an Army program, loitering munitions and a new in-development Air Force drone.

Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks said the “Replicator 1.2” tranche of capabilities also includes software to “enhance the autonomy and resilience of other Replicator systems” as well as additional “low-cost long-range strike capabilities and maritime uncrewed systems” that will remain classified.

The Anduril Ghost X (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. LaShic Patterson)

 “The Replicator initiative is demonstrably reducing barriers to innovation, and delivering capabilities to warfighters at a rapid pace,” Hicks said in a statement on Wednesday. “We are creating opportunities for a broad range of traditional and nontraditional defense and technology companies, including system vendors, component manufacturers, and software developers, to deliver critical capabilities that our warfighters need, and we are building the capability to do that again and again.”

Hicks first detailed the Replicator initiative in August 2023, with the initial effort focused on producing and fielding thousands of all-domain attritable autonomous systems (ADA2) by August 2025 “to help us overcome [China’s] biggest advantage, which is mass,” with the 1.2 systems also intended to meet that fielding timeframe (Defense Daily, Aug. 28 2023).

The Pentagon has not disclosed many specifics on Replicator and capabilities involved, while confirming in May it had started delivering initial systems and that AeroVironment’s [AVAV] Switchblade 600 was one of the capabilities chosen for mass production under the first tranche of the program (Defense Daily, May 23).

For both the first and tranches of equipment under Replicator to date, Hicks said the Pentagon considered more than 500 commercial firms for hardware and software contracting and “major subcontracting opportunities.”

Replicator 1.2 includes scaling up the Army’s new Company-Level small UAS program, in which the service has recently selected Anduril Industries’ Ghost X and Performance Drone Works’ (PDW) C-100 (Defense Daily, Sept. 12). 

The Army first approved the company-level sUAS directed requirement in June 2023, which it has said previously aims to deliver “immediate, commercially available capability to meet operational requirements” for brigade combat teams” and the Pentagon added on Wednesday could be utilized for “reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition missions”

“Ukraine has demonstrated the value of small, attritable drones on the battlefield,” Gen. Randy George, the Army chief of staff, said in a statement on Wednesday. “The delivery of commercially available Company Level Small UAS with support from the Replicator initiative will allow American soldiers to rapidly experiment, learn and innovate with these systems. The advancement of battlefield technology requires us to innovate faster than ever before.”

For the loitering munition, the Pentagon on Wednesday said its scaling up planned fielding and experimentation with Anduril’s Altius-600 system, which is currently part of the Marine Corps’ Organic Precision Fires program. 

“Replicator is helping Marines experiment with a portfolio of systems that deliver organic, loitering, beyond-line-of-sight precision strike capability,” Gen. Eric Smith, commandant of the Marine Corps, said in a statement. “Expanded experimentation with these systems will inform future Organic Precision Fires efforts and enable refinement of our Force Design, concepts and doctrine.”

The Pentagon on Wednesday added the Altius-600 “complements” AeroVironment’s Switchblade 600, which was selected for the first tranche of Replicator. 

“In many ways, Anduril was founded specifically to achieve the stated goals of the Replicator initiative: to accelerate the development, production, acquisition, and employment of large numbers of affordable, attritable autonomous systems. Across our business, we are delivering transformative, software-defined solutions at speed to ensure that warfighters have the capabilities they need, when they need them,” Anduril said in a statement on Wednesday.

Replicator 1.2 will also include the Air Force and the Defense Innovation Unit’s Enterprise Test Vehicle (ETV) program, which is currently assessing drone weapon prototypes from Leidos’ [LDOS] Dynetics, Anduril, Integrated Solutions for Systems, Inc. and Zone 5 Technologies (Defense Daily, June 3). 

“The ETV’s modular design and open system architecture make it an ideal platform for program offices to test out new capabilities at the sub-system level, reducing risk, and demonstrating various options for weapon employment,” Gen. Jim Slife, the Air Force’s vice chief of staff, said on Wednesday. “We are excited to be a part of Replicator 1.2 and to increase the speed of the ETV effort.”

For the software piece to Replicator 1.2, the Pentagon said it’s pursuing “integrated enablers” that would support “resilient decision-making architectures for collaborative autonomy teaming” and capability for “coordinating hundreds or thousands of unmanned assets in a secure shared environment.”

An announcement is forthcoming on DIU’s plans to use Commercial Solutions Openings to acquire the “integrated software enablers” for Replicator 1.2, according to DoD. 

“Combining cutting-edge hardware with cutting-edge software — the capabilities and needs of each pushing the bounds of what is possible with the other — is at the heart of the very best of technology in the commercial sector,” DIU Director Doug Beck said in a statement. “Replicator is harnessing this same synergy, ensuring we can adopt commercial best practices to iteratively develop, test, and ultimately field autonomous systems, both individually and collectively, at scale.”

The Pentagon said in late September that it will focus on counter-drone technology for the subsequent “Replicator 2.0” effort (Defense Daily, Sept. 30).

Rocket Lab Signs First Neutron Launch Contract, Posts 55% Growth in Q3

Rocket Lab [RKLB] announced its first launch deal for the upcoming medium-lift Neutron rocket —  a multi-launch agreement with an unnamed commercial satellite constellation operator. 

Rocket Lab announced the deal on Tuesday along with its third quarter financial results, posting 55% year-over-year growth. The company’ stock price surged 50% on Wednesday after the news. 

Under the Neutron deal, Rocket Lab will launch two dedicated missions on Neutron starting from mid-2026. The missions will launch from Rocket Lab’s launch complex in the United States, on Wallops Island, Virginia. Rocket Lab said the company could deploy customer’s entire constellation. 

“Constellation companies and government satellite operators are desperate for a break in the launch monopoly,” CEO Peter Beck said in the release. “They need a reliable rocket from a trusted provider, and one that’s reusable to keep launch costs down and make space more frequently accessible – and Neutron is strongly positioned to be that rocket that provides choice and value to the industry.”

Third Quarter Results 

Rocket Lab delivered 55% year-over-year increase in revenue in the third quarter of 2024, reaching $105 million. Growth was driven by the company’s Space Systems business, particularly the MDA Space and Space Development Agency (SDA) contracts. Net loss was $51.9 million. 

Space Systems delivered $83.9 million in revenue — 80% of the company’s revenue during the quarter. 

Rocket Lab conducted three launches during the quarter, and said one launch was pushed back due to customer readiness. Launch revenue was $21 million during the quarter. 

The company’s backlog stands at $1.05 billion — representing 80% year-over-year growth. This includes $55 million in new launch contracts signed in the third quarter. Rocket Lab expects approximately half of this backlog to be recognized within 12 months. Roughly 69% of the backlog is attributed to Space Systems. 

Rocket Lab provided revenue guidance for Q4 of $125 million to $135 million, which would be the company’s largest quarter ever. If Rocket Lab achieves the midpoint of that guidance it would represent around $434 million in revenue, 77% percent growth over last year

This story was first published by Via Satellite

U.S. Air Force to Refine CCA Increment 2 Concept, As Service Announces Buy of More Increment 1 Aircraft

The U.S. Air Force plans to refine its concept for the future Increment 2 of the Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA).

“Increment 2–we are ‘danger’ close to getting started in earnest on that,” Col. Timothy Helfrich, the senior materiel leader for Air Force Materiel Command’s advanced aircraft division, told the inaugural Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies’ future airpower forum in Arlington, Va.

“We’re doing government analysis right now with FFRDCs [federally funded research development centers] and internal government agencies to look to make sure we understand the right mission use cases for Increment 2 and the top level attributes,” he said. “Next year–actually, this fiscal year–we will kick off concept refinement where we bring in industry to help us further refine what those attributes are and whittle down those use cases. It’s the same approach we did for CCA Increment 1, but now CCA Increment 1 is a new player in the environment as we do the analysis. You’ll see us begin concept refinement later this year.”

The first CCAs are to be air-to-air, but others may be those for intelligence or jamming missions. The Air Force has said that it plans to field 150 CCAs in the next five years to complement F-35s and possibly other manned fighters, including a manned Next Generation Air Dominance aircraft and the F-15EX.

In April, the Air Force said that it had chosen privately-held drone makers, General Atomics and Anduril, for the first round of CCA–the so-called Increment 1 (Defense Daily, Apr. 24). General Atomics offered its Gambit design and Anduril its Fury.

The companies beat defense industry heavyweights Boeing [BA], Lockheed Martin [LMT], and Northrop Grumman [NOC], though these companies and others are free to bid on future CCA increments.

Increment 2 may feature more advanced, stealthier designs than Increment 1.

Air Force acquisition chief Andrew Hunter said on Tuesday that the service is buying more CCAs for Increment 1 testing.

General Atomics and Anduril may conduct first flights in the next year of their Fury and Gambit offerings for the first increment of CCA–first flights that could result soon thereafter in the beginning of developmental test (DT) under the Air Force CCA Experimental Operations Unit at Nellis AFB, Nev.’s 53rd Wing (Defense Daily, Sept. 17).

“The additional buy for the Air Force helps ensure that warfighters will have ample opportunity for experimentation to support operational fielding before the end of the decade,” Diem Salmon, Anduril’s vice president for air dominance and strike, said in a company statement on Tuesday in response to Hunter’s disclosure of a planned buy of more Increment 1 CCAs.

What may help CCA attain a unit cost goal of $30 million is a short

logistics “tail” that Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin discussed on Oct. 31 (Defense Daily, Oct. 31).