Defense Daily, Thursday, March 27, 2025, Vol. 305, Issue 56

Thursday, March 27, 2025 • 67th Year • Volume 305 • No. 56

Army Official Sees Promise In Industry’s ‘Cheaper,’ ‘Quicker’ Autonomous Launcher Concept

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. – An Army official leading long-range fires development said Wednesday industry has demonstrated a promising offering for a “cheaper,” “quicker” autonomous launcher concept, citing an interest in having such solutions participate in the Transforming in Contact (TiC) initiative.

Brig. Gen. Rory Crooks, director of the Long Range Precision Fires Cross-Functional Team, said the Army is interested in building on its own work developing the Autonomous Multi-Domain Launcher (AML) concept to further bolster capacity, survivability and range capability.

“It wasn’t until we had an industry partner that…developed their own [autonomous launcher] with their own [internal research and development] that showed us we can probably do this a little bit quicker than we thought we could and maybe cheaper,” Crooks said in remarks at AUSA’s Global Force Symposium here.

Crooks told Defense Daily following his remarks he could not disclose the vendor that showcased its solution at the Army’s recent Project Convergence experiment, while noting that several companies have made advancements in the autonomous launcher space.

“They came out with a pretty simply, cost-effective [solution] that we’re interested in,” Crooks said. “They’re not the only one. We’re also talking to other vendors that are proposing their own versions of this. So that’s what’s exciting, we can do this fairly fast because industry’s already leaning into it.”

RTX’s [RTX] Raytheon recently demonstrated its new DeepStrike autonomous launcher at Project Convergence, which included teaming with Oshkosh Defense [OSK] to utilize its Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) A2 as the base for the platform and self-driving technology startup Forterra contributing the autonomy kits that utilizes its AutoDrive software (Defense Daily, March 25). 

Raytheon fired its offering for the Joint Reduced Range Rocket (JR3) program, which utilizes a rocket motor developed by Ursa Major, during the demonstration, and Brian Burton, the company’s vice president of precision fires and maneuver, told Defense Daily on Wednesday that DeepStrike is designed to be “effector agnostic.”

Burton, a day prior, said Raytheon received “incredibly positive” feedback on the DeepStrike demo. 

Crooks said the Army is also keeping an eye on the Marine Corps’ developments in the autonomous launcher space.

The Marine Corps has been moving out on the ROGUE-Fires program which takes an unmanned version of Oshkosh Defense’s Joint Light Tactical Vehicle and integrates a ground launcher on the chassis, and in January awarded Forterra a $29.9 million award to bring self-driving capability to the platform (Defense Daily, Jan. 13). 

Oshkosh Defense, at the Global Force Symposium, is showcasing for the first time the ROGUE-Fires platform with a launch pod for the Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) Family of Munitions (MFOM).

The Army has spent several years developing and working with its own AML concept, a modified, unmanned version of the HIMARS launcher capable of firing the MLRS Family of Munitions.

“Basically with one step with autonomy, we think we’ve addressed three of those deficits in range, capacity and survivability,” Crooks told attendees at the Global Force Symposium. “When you have an autonomous system and use that for your first strike capability, now you have the ability to offload some of that risk from the counter-battery. So you have an autonomous vehicle that will help you with the survivability aspect.”

Crooks said the Army “absolutely [has] a desire” to get AML involved with TiC 2.0, with the Army expanding the rapid fielding initiative and placing an increased emphasis on autonomy capabilities

“We’ve got senior leaders looking for options right now of what we can do to pursue and get in the next 24 months AML out to those TiC 2.0 formations. We’re looking hard at that right now. I think there’s a lot of opportunity. So I’m optimistic we will have that,” Crooks said.

The Army’s TiC effort, spearheaded by Gen. Randy George, the service’s chief of staff, has focused on testing new operating concepts with select Army units and providing troops with new technology, such as drones and electronic warfare capabilities, to gather feedback and inform rapid fielding decisions.

With TiC 2.0 the Army is expanding the effort to two more divisions, two Armored Brigade Combat Teams, two Stryker Brigade Combat Teams as well as the service’s three Multi-Domain Task Forces and Special Operations Forces units, with plans to spend over $1 billion the next two years on fielding 1,110 UAS, more than 250 EW systems, over 2,000 mobility platforms, and 1,200 C-UAS systems (Defense Daily, March 26).

Matthew Beinart

Reporter: Cyber Security/IT/Military
Defense Daily
Ph: 240-477-2677

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: mbeinart22

Army Taps Three Vendors For Short Range Launched Effects Special User Demo

HUNTSVILLE, Ala.–The Army has selected three vendors to participate in a special user demonstration for its short range Launched Effects effort, an official confirmed Wednesday.

Brig. Gen. Cain Baker, director of the Army’s Future Vertical Lift Cross-Functional Team, said the vendors will provide air vehicles and payloads for the prototyping effort, which is expected to inform the Army’s roadmap for eventually procuring and fielding such capabilities.

An Army spokesperson told Defense Daily it could not disclose the vendors selected to participate, with an announcement expected to be made soon.

“We’ll take that out to a formation here this year. [We’ll] place it in the hands of a fires element, a combat aviation brigade element and a [Special Operations Forces] element, to put that inside their formations, one, to get soldier user feedback. The other piece [of that] is within staff, in the formation how they will use, which will then drive a lot of our doctrine and our training,” Baker said at the AUSA’s Global Force Symposium here.

Launched Effects is the Army’s program to field new autonomous air vehicles that can be launched from aircraft or ground platforms with a variety of payloads and mission system applications to provide a range of effects for reconnaissance, extended communications links and eventually lethal capabilities.

Army officials, including Baker, detailed plans a year ago to pursue rapid prototyping and eventual production for short, medium and long-range Launched Effects capabilities (Defense Daily, March 27 2024).

Baker first mentioned plans in September for a “special user demonstration” for its Launched Effects program, which will involve providing prototype capabilities to multiple formations for use over the next year to gather feedback and inform next steps (Defense Daily, Sept. 4 2024).

“We will actually take Launched Effects into multiple formations over the next year and leave it with them. And I’m talking [about] not only the vehicles [but also] the software, the command and control device and the payloads. So they’ll now have that for an extended period of time so they can have it for home station training and for individual and collective [training]. We’ll take that feedback and we’ll drive the program from there,” Baker said at the time.

With the Army planning to emphasize autonomy as it expands its Transforming in Contact (TiC) rapid fielding initiative, Baker told Defense Daily on Tuesday that the short range LE solutions selected for the special user demo will also participate with “a portion of TiC.”

“With the success of this [effort], we’ll hopefully spring off of that to actually expand it across all of the TiC capabilities,” he said. 

The Army has previously said that payload configurations for potential short range LE systems may include Electro-Optical/Infra-Red, Radio Frequency Detect, Identify, Locate, Report, lethal/kinetic, communications relay, and RF Decoy systems (Defense Daily, Jan. 2 2024).

Matthew Beinart

Reporter: Cyber Security/IT/Military
Defense Daily
Ph: 240-477-2677

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: mbeinart22

Kelly Calls SLCM-N Program ‘Disruptive,’ STRATCOM Commander Disagrees

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) Wednesday told the commander of the Strategic Command Air Force Gen. Anthony Cotton that he thinks adding a nuclear warhead to the nation’s submarines could be “disruptive” to the maritime program.

A planned nuclear-armed, sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N) would be deployed on the Virginia-class submarines and would include a variant of the W80-4 air-launched cruise missile warhead. The W80-4 is something that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is already working on.

“One of my concerns here is one of the things that makes us stand out is our submarine force, especially the attack submarines are incredibly effective,” Kelly said. Kelly’s remarks came at a hearing with the Senate Armed Services subcommittee on Strategic Forces on the budget for fiscal 2026 and the future of the defense program. The hearing featured Cotton as a witness.

“To integrate a tactical nuclear missile into a Virginia-class sub would take modifications that are significant,” Kelly said. “You’d have to put the security system that we have in effect for nuclear weapons” The problem, Kelly said, is that “I think it would be somewhat disruptive. I think that needs to be a consideration before we go down the road of significant modifications to these systems.”

Cotton responded, “I don’t know that it would be disruptive” and applauded U.S. “allies’ and partners’ ability of letting us have dual-use nuclear-capable things arrive on their shores.”

“I think there’s work to be done, but I think it could be accomplished,” Cotton said.

Meanwhile, other Senators on the subcommittee were also in favor of SLCM-N, including Chair Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), whose state includes the silos for nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles, currently for Boeing [BA]-made Minuteman III and intended for Northrop Grumman [NOC] Sentinel missiles that are supposed to replace Minuteman III.

“This committee on a bipartisan basis strongly supports SLCM,” Fischer said earlier in the hearing. Fischer said in her opening statement that she thought the nation was “woefully underprepared” in terms of its strategic capabilities, but when she asked Cotton if he thought SLCM-N would address the “capability gap,” Cotton said it would.

Sarah Salem
Email: [email protected] |

Portuguese Air Force Analyzing Options for F-16 Replacement

LISBON, Portugal–While the Portuguese defense minister recently downplayed the Lockheed Martin [LMT] F-35 fighter as a candidate to replace the country’s 28 F-16s, the F-35 may still be in the running.

The Portuguese Air Force’s Vision 5.3 last year “links with technology and fifth generation fighters, and dot 3 comes from people, processes, and technology,” Portuguese Air Force Maj. Gen. Joao Nogueira, director of weapons system maintenance, told reporters here.

Portugal has been a member of the European partnership on F-16s and the NATO Multi-National Fighter Program with Denmark, Belgium, Holland, Norway, and the United States to share F-16 upgrade costs and configurations.

“A stamp that is glued with F-35 relates with fifth generation, and that is a glue and an important step that, of course, we need to look to because all the countries that were with us in the F-16 group shifted to the F-35 solution,” Nogueira said on Wednesday. “Saying that is not saying that we are not looking to other options because we need to analyze what the other ones can do or cannot do…There are pro’s and con’s that we need to put in our analysis and put to the politicians all the information they need to get in order to take those decisions that are not easy ones, impact a lot the future of the Air Force, and, of course, involve a substantial amount of money also.”

Alternatives for Portugal other than the F-35 include Dassault‘s Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, and the Saab JAS-39 Gripen.

The airframe of Portugal’s F-16M “is aging so we have to perform more repairs, more replacements of some parts–also, on the avionics side because the repairs we have to perform we have less options in the market to be so fast in changing a specific LRU or addressing some unscheduled repairs,” Nogueira said on Wednesday. “So we are having less solutions to be with the same level of readiness that we aim to.”

For the future, the Portuguese Air Force is considering what fighter will serve the country and NATO best into the 2030s, he said.

This month, Portugal Defense Minister Nuno Melo said that Portugal is unlikely to buy the F-35 despite the Portuguese Air Force recommending the fighter as the prime candidate to replace the country’s F-16s (Defense Daily, March 20).

“We cannot ignore the geopolitical environment in our choices,” Melo said. “The recent position of the United States, in the context of NATO…must make us think about the best options, because the predictability of our allies is a greater asset to take into account.” Melo said that Portugal is concerned that the U.S. “could bring limitations to use, maintenance, components, and everything that has to do with ensuring that aircraft will be operational and used in all types of scenarios.”

A week after Melo’s comments, Rasmus Jarlov, the chairman of the Danish Parliament’s defense committee, advised NATO countries to avoid the buy of U.S. military equipment, including the F-35.

Frank Wolfe
Email: [email protected] |

Drone Defense For NNSA Proposed in Bipartisan Legislation

A bipartisan group of congressional representatives want to expand the National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) authority to develop counter drone technology, according to a press release by Rep. Susie Lee (D-Nev.). 

The Nuclear Ecosystem Drone Defense Act (NEDD) was introduced by: Reps. Lee and Mark Amodei (R) from Nevada, Chuck Fleischmann (R-Tenn.), and Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), according to a March 18 press release.

The representatives announced what would become a bicameral bill in the House to increase protection of DoE nuclear assets from “unmanned aerial systems,” or drones. The legislation comes amid a series of drone sightings near NNSA facilities.

Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) is leading companion legislation in the other chamber, the press release said.

The NEDD Act would allow DoE to acquire drone technology, similar to “that of our adversaries,” to test counter-drone systems, the release said. It would also allow DoE to develop defense systems and expand the definition of “covered assets” to include facilities housing nuclear weapons components and transport vehicles.

“Unauthorized drones pose a serious threat to America’s nuclear resources related to national security, including at the Nevada National Security Site where we maintain America’s nuclear weapons ecosystem,” Lee, a member of the House Appropriations subcommittee on Defense, said in the release. “Our bipartisan NEDD Act bill will give the Department of Energy the tools it needs to defend all its nuclear and national security assets from unauthorized enemy drones.”

“[A]dversaries should not be able to fly a drone over anywhere in this country that makes part of a nuclear weapon,” Moulton, ranking member of the House Armed Services subcommittee on strategic forces, said. 

NNSA is the “cornerstone of our strategic production capabilities” that should have “tools to protect our most sensitive security capabilities,” Fleischman said. He is chair of the House Appropriations energy and water subcommittee and his district abuts Y-12 National Security Complex and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Sarah Salem
Email: [email protected] |

ULA Vulcan Rocket Now Certified for US National Security Missions

The United Launch Alliance (ULA) Vulcan rocket is now certified for U.S. national security missions after receiving certification from the U.S. Space Force.

Space Systems Command’s (SSC) Assured Access to Space organization announced the certification on Wednesday for National Security Space Launch (NSSL) missions. ULA is now eligible to launch NSSL missions as one of two certified providers, the other being SpaceX.

ULA is a joint venture between Boeing [BA] and Lockheed Martin [LMT].

The first two Vulcan launches, which took place in January 2024 and October 2024, were part of the certification process. The Vulcan rocket experienced a nozzle anomaly on the second mission, but it did not impact orbital insertion. The certification process included 52 criteria including more than 180 discrete tasks, 60 payload interface requirement verifications, 18 subsystem design and test reviews, and 114 hardware and software audits.

“Assured access to space is a core function of the Space Force and a critical element of national security,” Brig. Gen. Kristin Panzenhagen, program executive officer for Assured Access to Space, said in a release. “Vulcan certification adds launch capacity, resiliency, and flexibility needed by our nation’s most critical space-based systems.”

Both ULA and SpaceX have provided launch services to the government under SSC’s NSSL program. In October, SpaceX received the first task orders under Phase 3 Lane 1 of the NSSL program, worth $734 million. SSC is expected to announce more awards for Phase 3, Lane 1 this spring. Blue Origin is also eligible to compete for task orders in Phase 3, Lane 1, but the New Glenn rocket does not have NSSL certification yet.

“Vulcan is uniquely designed to meet the challenging requirements demanded by an expanding spectrum of missions for U.S. national security space launches,” ULA CEO Tory Bruno commented in a release. “Moreover, this next-generation rocket provides high performance and extreme accuracy while continuing to deliver to our customer’s most challenging and exotic orbits.”

This certification comes later than ULA originally projected. Before the second Vulcan launch, Bruno said ULA would launch two more Vulcan missions for the Space Force before the end of 2024.

This article was first published by Via Satellite.

Rachel Jewett

Via Satellite Senior Managing Editor

Email: [email protected] |

Coast Guard Awards $952 Million Contract Mod To Bollinger To Complete First Polar Icebreaker

The Coast Guard on Tuesday awarded Bollinger Shipyards a $951.6 million contract modification to complete the detail design and construction of the first Polar Security Cutter (PSC), with work expected to be completed in May 2030.

If delivery of the PSC also occurs in 2030, the Coast Guard’s first new heavy polar icebreaker will be six years late. Moreover, the fixed-price-incentive-firm target contract modification increases substantially the cost of the first vessel.

In April 2019, the Coast Guard awarded the former VT Halter Marine—acquired by Bollinger in November 2022—$745.9 million for the engineering and detail design of the ship class, and procurement of long lead-time materials and construction of the first ship. That contract included options for two additional PSCs for a combined value of $1.9 billion for the three-ship buy.

The Coast Guard’s program of record is for three PSCs, although a fleet mix analysis has shown a potential need for more of the vessels. That analysis shows the service needs a combined fleet of eight or nine polar icebreakers consisting of a mix of PSCs and a yet-to-be-developed and built new medium polar icebreaker to break ice in the Arctic and Antarctic regions.

“The PSC’s mission will be to ensure continued access to both polar regions and support the country’s economic, commercial, maritime, and national security needs,” the Navy said in the contract award notice. The award was made through Naval Sea Systems Command. The program is managed by a Coast Guard-Navy integrated program office.

Earlier this month the Coast Guard said that Bollinger was nearly 92 percent complete with the PSC’s design. The last heavy polar icebreaker built in the U.S., the current Polar Star, was commissioned in 1976. The service’s lone medium polar icebreaker, the Healy, was commissioned in 1999.

Design and construction of the new PSC has been hampered by the fact that no U.S. shipyard has built a heavy icebreaker in nearly 50 years, and the shipbuilding industrial base has to contend with a complex design and a shortage of requisite skills.

The Department of Homeland Security in December approved the Coast Guard allowing Bollinger to continue building prefabrication units of the ship to further develop the skills and expertise needed to move full production (Defense Daily, Dec. 24, 2024). The Coast Guard describes this a “progressive crawl-walk-run approach.”

Approval to begin full production awaits.

“Securing this contract modification has truly been a herculean effort and underscores the incredible trust the U.S. government has placed in Bollinger to build and deliver the first heavy polar icebreaker in half a century,” Ben Bordelon, president and CEO of Bollinger, said in a statement. “We wouldn’t be in the solid position we’re in today without the leadership and the tireless efforts of the entire team at Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding. Their hard work and dedication have successfully put the PSC program on a strong path forward after a rocky start under the previous, foreign-owned builder. We now look forward to receiving the green light to begin full production.”

VT Halter Marine, which was based in Mississippi, was owned by Singapore’s ST Engineering.

A contracting announcement said 56 percent of the work will be done in Pascagoula, Miss., 7 percent in Boston, and the rest spread across other cities and towns in the U.S.

Bollinger said it has invested $76 million across its Mississippi facilities since acquiring VT Halter Marine, which was based in the state. The Louisiana-based company also said it has increased its workforce there by over 61 percent, with production roles at Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding up 178 percent. Hiring will continue as the program moves into full production in the coming years, it said.

To fill a gap in polar icebreaking needs, the Coast Guard in December acquired a commercial icebreaker, which will be commissioned as the Storis, that will operate in Alaska waters this summer.

Cal Biesecker

Reporter: Business/Homeland Security
Defense Daily
Ph: 434-242-7750

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: calvinb21

Space Force Warfighting Strategy Coming Soon

The U.S. Space Force will soon release a strategy outlining its framework for attaining space superiority and to give operational planners a common playbook, the service’s top uniformed official said on Wednesday.

The strategy will not contain anything new for “those of us that have been kind of working in the margins of this for a while” but it will create a “common vocabulary” and “common terms of reference,” and lay out how to achieve space superiority, Chief of Space Operations Gen. Chance Saltzman said during a webinar hosted by the Mitchell Institute. It will not be a “grand” strategy, he said.

As it develops a culture built around space superiority and space as a warfighting domain, the Space Force has to understand the related operational concepts, such as battle management, Saltzman said. This is important for operators and planners, he said.

Stood up in 2019, the Space Force is focusing on being able to fight and win in space as U.S. adversaries work to develop capabilities aimed at denying the country’s advantages in space. The strategy will lay out the targets on the ground, in space, and related networks that have to be part of operational planning, Saltzman said.

Saltzman highlighted how at the outset of the Russo-Ukraine war Russia used a ground-focused cyber-attack to degrade a satellite communications network operated by Viasat [VSAT].

“We have to be ready to protect and think about space superiority in all of those dimensions,” he said. “And so, what the what the framework does is it lays those out, it defines our terms, so that planners, and this is space planners, but this is [also] joint planners to make sure that our capabilities are accounted for and integrated fully into all the operational design. We felt like we owed the joint force that set of framework, that set of definitions, so that we could have the right kinds of discussions.”

Saltzman and his fellow Guardians have been vocal about the need for the Space Force’s budget to grow at a faster rate than the incremental annual increases common throughout the Defense Department in the face of rapidly evolving threats in the space domain. Without a “step function” in its budget, 3 to 4 percent annual increases will not buy new capability, just enable the service to be “treading water,” he said in response to a question about an ongoing DoD review to reprioritize up to 8 percent from low priority needs in favor of high priority programs.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said the space domain is the most important in modern warfare, which Saltzman said gives him confidence about the reprioritization underway for the fiscal year 2026 budget in development. The service is assessing what its lower and higher priority programs as a “planning drill” but is not making any decisions for the moment, as this will be Hegseth’s “decision space,” he said.

“And so, I’m hopeful that the Space Force won’t take any cuts,” Saltzman said. “I certainly don’t want to talk about potential cuts that may not happen, because we want to keep everything we’ve got. We believe that the things we have are still necessary to modern warfare. They’re still necessary to support the joint force, but we just have to grow and add additional priorities.”

Saltzman did lament the continuing resolution (CR) that the federal government will operate under for funding the rest of fiscal year 2025. The resolution leaves the Space Force with less funding in FY ’25 than it had in FY ’24, “so we are literally shrinking in resources,” he said.

This means the Space Force will be on the same baseline budget for two years, and if there is a CR to start off FY ’26, then it will be more than two years, which is “stagnant, and in the face of an adversary who is not stagnant, I’m worried that we’re not going to be able to keep pace, certainly the way we want to,” Saltzman said.

Cal Biesecker

Reporter: Business/Homeland Security
Defense Daily
Ph: 434-242-7750

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: calvinb21

Electric Boat Nabs $1 Billion Contract Mod For Virginia Block VI Sub Material

General Dynamics’ [GD] Electric Boat won another undefinitized contract modification worth up to $1.065 billion for the long lead time material for Block VI Virginia-class attack submarines.

Previously, in August 2024 Electric Boat won a modification worth up to $1.3 billion for economic ordering quantity material to support Block VI boats and to commit to a healthy submarine industrial base (Defense Daily, Aug. 5, 2024).

Then last October Electric Boat won another $2 billion in four contracts for submarine industrial base support, including up to $350 million for long lead time material for Block VI boats (Defense Daily, Oct. 9, 2024).

“This contract modification drives continuation of the crucial demand signal that the submarine industrial base needs to invest in the capacity and materials required to increase production volume,” Mark Rayha, president of Electric Boat, said in a statement. “Consistent funding for the supply base is essential to achieve the high-rate production the Navy requires of the entire submarine enterprise.”

The Block VI boats are being procured in a multiyear contract that lasts from FY 2024 to 2028, after the 10 Block V hull order ended in FY 2023. Block VI will be the second increment, after Block V submarines, to feature the Virginia Payload Module (VPM) that adds four large diameter payload tubes in the middle section. The VPM will make each submarine capable of fielding up to 28 Tomahawk missiles. 

In 2020, a Navy official said the Block VI submarines are planned to continue moving the Navy forward to field improvements that will ultimately serve as the backbone of the next-generation SSN(X) attack submarines, including acoustic superiority, improved stealth, sonar performance and sensing and interacting with the water column and seafloor (Defense Daily, Nov. 20, 2020).  

Rich Abott

Reporter: Navy/Missile Defense
Defense Daily
Ph: 703-522-5915

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: ReaderRabott

Qatar In Line For Potential $2 Billion FMS Deal For MQ-9s, Munitions, Other Equipment

The State Department on Wednesday said it approved a potential $2 billion foreign military sale (FMS) to Qatar that includes eight MQ-9B remotely piloted aircraft, missiles, radars, and other sensors.

The MQ-9B SkyGuardian unmanned aircraft are supplied by General Atomics’ Aeronautical Systems business.

The proposed deal also includes 200 Boeing [BA] KMU-572 Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) tail kits for Guided Bomb Unit (GBU)-38s or Laser JDAM GBU-54s. Qatar also wants 300 BLU-111 500-pound general purpose bombs, 110 AGM-1142R Hellfire II missiles, 100 each of MXU-650 air foil groups and MAU-169 computer control groups for Lockheed Martin [LMT] Paveway II GBU-12 laser-guided bombs, 10 General Atomics Lynx AN/APY-8 synthetic aperture radars, 10 L3Harris Technologies [LHX] Rio Grande communications intelligence suites, and Honeywell [HON] TPE-331 turboprop engines.

Other equipment that would be part of the FMS includes embedded GPS/inertial navigation system security devices with M-Code, EGI security devices with Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing Modules, M299 Longbow Hellfire launchers, fuze systems, laser illuminated target detectors, IFF transponders, and a slew of other electronic equipment.

In addition to General Atomics, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and L3Harris, other principal contractors on the deal include RTX [RTX], and Italy’s Leonardo, the State Department said.

“The proposed sale will improve Qatar’s capability to meet current and future threats by providing timely intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, target acquisition, counter-land, and counter-surface sea capabilities for its security and defense,” the State Department said. “This capability is a deterrent to regional threats and will primarily be used to strengthen its homeland defense.”

Cal Biesecker

Reporter: Business/Homeland Security
Defense Daily
Ph: 434-242-7750

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: calvinb21

SOCOM Awards Anduril $86 Million To Enable Rapid Integration Of Autonomous Capabilities

Anduril Industries has received an $86 million contract to partner with U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) to create the architecture and standards for integrating autonomy technology into the command’s unmanned systems (UxS), the company said on Wednesday.

Under the three-year contract Anduril will be helping USSOCOM create the foundation to take charge of its mission autonomy plans to meet evolving battlespace needs, the company said.

Anduril said it “will support USSOCOM in developing their infrastructure, enabling them to integrate, test, validate, and deploy government-owned and commercial mission autonomy software and enabling technology across their robotic platforms. The infrastructure will cover the entire software development lifecycle, including data export and management, data model and interface validation, and system-level verification and validation, establishing a reliable, interoperable, and trusted foundation for SOCOM to rapidly and continuously integrate collaborative terms of autonomous systems into their operations.”

In the next few months Anduril said it will use its Lattice for Mission Autonomy platform at capability demonstrations and integration events to “prove out” how the platform will speed the ability of USSOCOM deploy autonomous capabilities. The use of Lattice for Mission Autonomy will enable a “paradigm shift in SOCOM operations that is focused on collaborative mission autonomy and coordinated mass effects,” Anduril said.

The new contract expands Anduril’s work with USSOCOM. In early 2022, the command awarded the company a 10-year, nearly $1 billion contract to be its systems integrator for counter-unmanned systems needs worldwide (Defense Daily, Jan. 24, 2022). Anduril said that under the earlier award it has “developed, integrated, and deployed hundreds” of its, other vendors’, and government-owned hardware and software capabilities in support of the command’s counter-UxS efforts.

Cal Biesecker

Reporter: Business/Homeland Security
Defense Daily
Ph: 434-242-7750

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: calvinb21

White House Picks Heritage Naval Analyst To Lead MARAD

The White House nominated Brent Sadler, a naval analyst at the Heritage Foundation, to be the administrator for the Transportation Department’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) on March 24, according to Senate notice this week. 

The administration did not announce the nomination before this public publication. The nomination was referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, which oversees the Department of Transportation. 

If confirmed, Sadler would succeed Ann Phillips, who resigned earlier this year after serving since 2022.

Sadler has served as a senior research fellow for naval warfare and advanced technology at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank since 2020.

He served in the Navy for 26 years, reaching the rank of captain. His Heritage biography lists experience establishing the Navy Asia Pacific Advisory group in 2011 to inform the Chief of Naval Operations, serving in several positions at Pacific Command from 2012-2015, on the CNO’s personal staff in 2015-2016, as a senior defense official and defense and naval attache in Malaysia and finishing his career assigned to the China Branch of the Navy Staff at the Pentagon.

MARAD oversees the U.S. Merchant Marine and Sadler, if confirmed, would join as the Trump administration considers major changes to the maritime industry. MARAD also maintains the National Defense Reserve Fleet (NRDF) and its Ready Reserve Force (RRF) as a force to support deploying U.S. military forces and supplies when needed.

During a joint address to Congress earlier this month, Trump announced the creation of a new office of shipbuilding that will offer special tax incentives to industry for more domestic shipbuilding. 

In a February report, the Government Accountability Office said that while the agency’s budget grew over 300 percent from 2015 to 2024, as of September 2024, it has a 12.3 percent vacancy rate, equivalent to 116 out of 941 full-time positions. The report also noted MARAD separated 235 more employees than it hired over the past decade, making it “increasingly difficult for the staff to accomplish their mission.”

The report also found MARAD did not fully implement key strategic workforce planning principles into its strategic workforce plan.

Rich Abott

Reporter: Navy/Missile Defense
Defense Daily
Ph: 703-522-5915

Email: [email protected] | Twitter: ReaderRabott

www.defensedaily.com
© echo date(‘Y’); ?> Access Intelligence, LLC. Federal copyright law prohibits unauthorized reproduction by any means and imposes fines up to $150,000 for violations.